• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Pressview XL's bundled profiler vs 3rd party?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pressview XL's bundled profiler vs 3rd party?


  • Subject: Re: Pressview XL's bundled profiler vs 3rd party?
  • From: neil snape <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:53:56 +0100

on 28/11/2000 2:55, j wilhelm at email@hidden wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> With the previous discussion regarding Lacie's new Blue Eye being inferior
> to OptiCal and Andrew's decision to dump Pressview's profiling software it
> got me to wondering how well a Pressview colorimeter compares with some of
> the newer profiling options.

> I am wondering, if one wants to calibrate and profile a Pressview monitor
> to be its very best is the all in one package of the Pressview sufficient?
> Are the newer devices such as the "spyder" or Spectrocam better. If its
> better how so?
check this out for all who have a Sequel device or who would like to see the
Blue eye software and the ambient light measure.

http://www.sequelimaging.com/html/techctr.htm
--
Neil Snape in Paris


References: 
 >Pressview XL's bundled profiler vs 3rd party? (From: j wilhelm <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Profilemaker 3
  • Next by Date: Adobe Gamma, profile does not show up.
  • Previous by thread: Re: Pressview XL's bundled profiler vs 3rd party?
  • Next by thread: Profile Quality? Why?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread