• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Profile Quality? Why?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Profile Quality? Why?


  • Subject: Re: Profile Quality? Why?
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:08:00 EST

In a message dated 11/28/00 12:14:40 PM, email@hidden writes:

>So, the different quality levels are implemented by having multiple tables
>in a profile? I was under the impression that quality was essentially the
>inverse of speed here and less precise but faster algorithms were used
>to do
>the color conversions.
>
>Which way is it?

The quality choices I am familiar with define the number of points on the
grid (say 17 each way versus 33 each way) and create profiles with more
defined points, catching small variances, but building much larger profiles,
that calculate more slowly. A to B conversions and B to A conversions do not
necessarily have the same number of grid points, and whole intents can be
left out, though the standard requires that they are referenced, which may
get you a different table instead of the one you asked for...

C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: PS6 Use of Monitor Profiles continued
  • Next by Date: tetrachromacy found
  • Previous by thread: Re: Profile Quality? Why?
  • Next by thread: Re: Profile Quality? Why?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread