Re: Portable Spectrophotometers (iCColor Remote)
Re: Portable Spectrophotometers (iCColor Remote)
- Subject: Re: Portable Spectrophotometers (iCColor Remote)
- From: Tom Beckenham <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:31:16 +1100
That is the most revolutionary idea I've heard on this list. If Gretag
implemented this, I would recommend it to every site we visit. Is this a
project yet?
on 12/2/02 23:54, Henrik Holmegaard at email@hidden wrote:
>
>
The iCColor is expandable and one of the concepts in the chute is
>
TCP/IP support with an add-on Ethernet card cf the brochure. If /
>
when eventually realized you might capture measurement sets remotely
>
and analyze them centrally e.g. for profile tweaking and tuning. You
>
might also run colorimetric process control on the same remote basis
>
regularly. IOW hand the unit to the press room customer, leave it on
>
site where all the press operator has to do is run the press to
>
density specs and feed the charts for automatic measurement (with
>
automatic white calibration) and automatic transmission of the data,
>
but not spend time with the MeasureTool let alone figuring out
>
whether to tweak Lab -> CMYK BtoA1 or CMYK -> Lab AtoB0 or whatever.
>
Press room runs presses, press room submits characterization data for
>
profiling and control data for checking, in-house color manager
>
manages color / outsourced consultant consults. IOW an extension of
>
the original ColorLab workflow through the profile editing
>
functionality of PM4.
>
>
The FOGRA / ISO concept of colorimetric process control is sensible
>
and IMO should be pushed whereever and whenever possible. If profile
>
tuning is what users want, then better have this centralized than
>
distributed in the color workflow, I'd think.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.