Re: gamma
Re: gamma
- Subject: Re: gamma
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:16:18 -0600
on 4/17/03 3:08 PM, David Sirola wrote:
>
I guess my simple question is, have we accepted gamma 2.2 as a mac standard
>
now?
In an ICC savvy application, it doesn't really matter. Outside it does. So
Photoshop and other such applications are quite happy with a display at 2.2
gamma. But if you're using a non ICC savvy application, the appearance may
be preferable at 1.8.
So again, why wasn't OSX produced to implement a 2.2 gamma since Apple was
starting with a "clean slate"?
Andrew Rodney
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >gamma (From: David Sirola <email@hidden>) |