Re: gamma
Re: gamma
- Subject: Re: gamma
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:32:41 -0400
>
Hi All:
>
>
stupid question from an 'ole mac user.....
>
>
Recently, I've been noticing mac photographers have been migrating from the
>
good, friendly gamma setting of 1.8 to the PeeCee standard 2.2.
>
>
For a long time, way back, our standard mac system gamma was 1.8.
>
>
Did I miss a meeting, where the accepted gamma setting has been bumped up to
>
2.2, or is this something of a preference. I've been happy to maintain my
>
system, spyder and scanner calibrations to 1.8.
>
>
I guess my simple question is, have we accepted gamma 2.2 as a mac standard
>
now?
>
>
thanks for indulging my dumb question...
Why not pay a visit to www.brucelindbloom.com for an objective, eye opening
experience about gamma settings! After that, you won't see any more reasons
to continue espousing 1.8.
There are no dumb questions.
My two cents,
Roger Breton
Laval, Canada
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >gamma (From: David Sirola <email@hidden>) |