• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
gamma
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gamma

  • Subject: gamma
  • From: David Sirola <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:08:40 -0400
Hi All:

stupid question from an 'ole mac user.....

Recently, I've been noticing mac photographers have been migrating from the
good, friendly gamma setting of 1.8 to the PeeCee standard 2.2.

For a long time, way back, our standard mac system gamma was 1.8.

Did I miss a meeting, where the accepted gamma setting has been bumped up to
2.2, or is this something of a preference. I've been happy to maintain my
system, spyder and scanner calibrations to 1.8.

I guess my simple question is, have we accepted gamma 2.2 as a mac standard
now?

thanks for indulging my dumb question...
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: gamma
      • From: David Harradine <email@hidden>
    • Re: gamma
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
    • Re: gamma
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Digital Camera Profiling
  • Next by Date: Jani Schulze/Helsinki/Canon/FI is out of the office.
  • Previous by thread: RE: Digital Camera Profiling
  • Next by thread: Re: gamma
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread