Re: LightJet vs Frontier Gamuts
Re: LightJet vs Frontier Gamuts
- Subject: Re: LightJet vs Frontier Gamuts
- From: Neil Speers <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:39:34 -0600
I'm not the most knowledgeable person on this list ( and that statement
is up for "understatement of the year <grin>) but from what I do
understand, sRGB was developed by Micro$oft and HP (if I remember
correctly) for web colours on poor monitors. I just came back from a
digital photography seminar where the instructor strongly suggested
Adobe1998 colour space because it maintains the colour fidelity and
works well with almost every printer. So, it it doesn't "hurt" the
printer to use a larger gamut, why would you want to compress the gamut
in your file before doing any work with it?
On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 11:00 PM,
email@hidden wrote:
I am trying to find reasons *not* to use sRGB for digital photography.
Regards,
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.