Re: use of sRGB as a default
Re: use of sRGB as a default
- Subject: Re: use of sRGB as a default
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:20:26 -0700
My understanding is that sRGB will remain the default for untagged
8-bit/channel RGB. (Which since the vast majority of untagged
8-bit/channel RGB IS sRGB, seems an entirely rational choice, sRGB
limitations notwithstanding.)
I'd love to hear a rational argument as to why usermonitorRGB is a
better default for untagged RGB than sRGB. If you assume sRGB you at
least have a hope of achieving similar appearance on all machines. If
you assume usermonitorRGB, which seems to be the current case, you
guarantee that the file will look different on every machine. That
does not seem a desirable color management outcome...
Bruce
At 10:48 AM -0400 6/18/04, Roger Breton wrote:
> We also understand that Microsoft has recognized the limitations of
sRGB, and has (as recently as WINHEC last month), made steps to remedy
this, and move beyond sRGB as a default space. BTW, apparently this
includes ICCv4 adoption.
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/display/color/default.mspx
So, is Microsoft taking the lead as far as color management is concerned
these days? How come the Apple web site does not have such a wealthy section
on color management (as MS does) and, yet, you were there way before them?
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.