• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Supplied RGB
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Supplied RGB


  • Subject: Re: Supplied RGB
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:46:21 -0400

I appreciate your response.

To be clear - I've tried to describe the symptoms, but have no interest in blame. With my proverbial blindfold on I can only determine that the elephants foot is big. :-)
What I would hope for and try to influence is some sort of standard and get that information out to those that need it. PrePress people, photographers, designers art directors etc

It seems to me that the the press is expensive, because it has to output many copies and quickly - but the whole screened 4/color print process does not impress me as being able to reliably depict images at a high standard.
When i look at a print from my desktop printer - it does manage to do it much better.
.... but the point is that is the only way to try to communicate what the image should look like.
CM works very well within my place, but fails once the file go out.....
Ii usually print on a Roland or get a digital proof from a pre-press house and the images i produce these days are done with digital backs and cameras that run into a lot of money.

I have very little say in who gets to print my images and no communication with those people and more often than not the results are pityfull and I do take into account the limitations of the 4/c process.

My main concern is that there is to be a standard way to deliver the files and have a reasonable expectation of the result.

Ulf Skogsbergh
http://www.ulf-photo.com


On Thursday, May 27, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Rich Apollo wrote:

Ulf,

I think it's pretty amazing that photogs and creatives on this list make the assumption that the final output on a million (or more) dollar press is wrong. The idea that the printer has the obligation to manipulate said press to match the output from the creatives' $300 inkjet stands the whole equation on its head.

Printers feel that they can't get all the information to facilitate the clients' wishes. They're just running around with big targets on their backs.

Creatives feel that they can't get all the information to work with the printer. The printers are secretive and misleading.

Who's right?

If I misconstrued your post I do apologize.

I've provided a press profile to exactly 2 clients, both at my insistence. I'm not even being asked the right questions.

In a survey I just got the results of, some color-managed printers were asked a series of questions:

3% of respondents said that 51%-75% of their clients asked for color management on their jobs.
47% of respondents said that none of their clients asked for color management on their jobs.

Again, if I misinterpreted your post I am sorry.

Rich Apollo
Priority Litho
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Match the Proofer?
  • Next by Date: Re: Match the Proofer?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Supplied RGB
  • Next by thread: Supplied RGB
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread