Re: Profile Names (was: FOGRA39 released)
Re: Profile Names (was: FOGRA39 released)
- Subject: Re: Profile Names (was: FOGRA39 released)
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:02:52 +0000
On 29 Dec 2006, at 14:26, Roger Breton wrote:
But, wait einen minuten, I think the name ISO should only be
used *IF and only IF* the profile originates from ISO, the
standardizing
organization. I agree that "Fogra ISO Coated" is a progress. But,
in my
view, "Fogra ISO Coated" should be really be named "Fogra Europe
Coated" and
"ECI ISO Coated" should be named "ECI Europe Coated".
ISO ink chemistry and print standards are worldwide standards - not
"European". US corporations like Adobe should recognise that rather
than peddling US-centric solutions to everybody around the globe.
On 29 Dec 2006, at 18:01, Karl Koch wrote:
The idea of an additional tag for the dataset is great, but that´ll
take time. Grouping profiles with a folder structure in
applications like Photoshop could be easier and faster (hey, Adobe
– CS3 ???)
Have you used it yet? If I worked at Apple I'd be getting a team
together to create a new Pro retouching app.
CS3 is the proof that Adobe are unable to innovate or even respond to
the possibilities offered by OS X. Simple example: the Apple OS has
been using the GPU for crunching pixels since 2002 - Adobe's official
response is that CPUs are getting so fast that they haven't needed to
bother.
And now they are in a situation where there is hardly a single task
in Photoshop that can be performed as fast as the Mac OS can do it.
It's about time Apple "joined the dots" and launched a Photoshop-
killing app - just like they did in video.
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden