Re: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
Re: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
- Subject: Re: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
- From: Jim Rich <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:50:59 -0500
- Thread-topic: Big problems using Bill Atkinssons new Eye-1 profiles
Bruce,
> What's the hard scientific definition of "better result"?
You know say comparing a 918 patch count to a +4000 patch count on different
medias and then compare the delta e values. And the of course look at the
prints.
> It takes longer to measure a higher patch count target, and a little
> longer to calculate the profile. There doesn't seem to be any
> performance hit in using the profile.
>
> There's an inherent trade-off between accuracy (lots of patches) and
> smoothness (lots of interpolation). The trade-off is different for
> different devices (and in some cases, for different papers on the
> same device).
>
> You can look at average, maximum and minimum delta-e for some
> population of colors, but the results will always depend on the
> population of colors you choose. Unfortunately, such evidence, while
> hard and scientific, tells you bugger-all about the profile's
> efficacy in reproducing actual work, like (for example) photographic
> images.
>
Your point here is one of this things I was getting at.
We agree.
Jim Rich
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden