Re: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson
Re: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson
- Subject: Re: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson
- From: John W Lund <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 11:35:36 -0700
Thanks, Terry for the excellent explanation of the linearization logic - it
does sound like what ColorBurst folks must have been thinking when they
decided on the UV-cut spectro approach.
A couple of comments for Dave Tuemmler:
1. ColorBurst has a special offer for current RIP owners (the full version,
not the one bundled with Epson 4800s) - they'll sell you a Pulse w/UV for
$795 - about a couple hundred less than the retail version, IIR. (But you
have to drive it with their SpectralVision module, no Monaco software
included)
2. They explain that yes, they created existing linearization files & paper
profiles with the UV-cut spectro, so to *re-linearize* one of their lin
files, you need to use a like-kind spectro. But a user can start over, and
create *new* linearization & profile with a non-UV EyeOne. I have done just
that, using Epson's Enhanced Matte paper (which definitely uses OBA) &
ProfileMaker Pro, with excellent results. (fine art/presentation prints, not
proofing)
I'm finding it a pretty versatile RIP, maybe more so than the company itself
claims...
Regards,
John
Terry Wyse <email@hidden> wrote:
> This is also why that, even if you have two
> spectros that measure quite differently, if the same spectros are
> used to create both the source and destination, the results will look
> very similar. But try mixing/matching spectros for source/destination
> and you've got a recipe for distaster.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden