Re: Re: proof verification (was: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson)
Re: Re: proof verification (was: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson)
- Subject: Re: Re: proof verification (was: Creating a SWOP proof with an Epson)
- From: "Roberto Michelena" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:08:48 -0500
On 7/15/06, Henk Gianotten <email@hidden> wrote:
In France some printers use the Sicogif standard. That's not (yet) 100% ISO
but it's a French national standard.
What I like about Sicogif is their proof validation specs; I think
it's much better than Fogra's in two aspects:
1) two-level tolerances: a "pass" tolerance (for example dE<6) and an
"optimum" tolerance (for example dE<3)
2) grouping (and applying different tolerances) to important colors:
there are specific tolerances defined for neutrals (average / max) and
for skin tones.
Probably the need for tighter tolerances in neutrals could be
addressed by a new version of Fogra tolerances based on dE00. Altough
I like the addressing of "memory colors" (specifically skin tones),
the use of dE00 would be a large enough advance to be satisfied for
the moment.
best regards,
-- Roberto Michelena
Infinitek
Lima, Peru
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden