Re: Chris Murphy vs Bruce Fraser
Re: Chris Murphy vs Bruce Fraser
- Subject: Re: Chris Murphy vs Bruce Fraser
- From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:48:08 -0600
On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Graeme Gill wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
It's for better consistency with v4, by providing the same
effective behavior for existing v2 profiles and also to head
operator error off at the pass.
I think you mean "to frustrate operators, and prevent them from
using true softproofing" :-). At least I've certainly seen puzzlement
bordering on frustration expressed in some forums, at Absolute Intent
not being honoured...
Define "true soft proofing".
ICC v4 prescribes the same result as an ICC v2 display profile has in
Photoshop since version 6. If you're saying ICC v4 soft proofing is
broken you are in effect saying it's been broken in Photoshop for a
long time.
Now there are a number of points of refinement for us to get to, but
it's better now than it was when the wtpt tag was being honored
literally while simultaneously assuming the end use was not fully
chromatically adapted to it which is how things use to work. And it
gave inferior results.
Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management, 2nd Ed"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-321-26722-2)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden