• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Who does the seperations?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who does the seperations?


  • Subject: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:25:52 -0800

In a message dated 1/2/07 1:54 PM, Lee Blevins wrote:

>> There's still a lot of mystique surrounding CMYK separations.
>
> As a color separator of more than 30 years experience I'd have to say
> there probably is a lot of mystique. Some of it is just luck.

I want to state with all due clarity and respect that in no way my comment
was meant to disparage the work of experienced and competent separators like
Mr. Blevins.

It's just that in the real world, in the real situations that one encounters
when, for example, separating a press-bound job that will end up on some
packaging that will be printed by Who-Knows-Who in the country of
Who-Knows-Where with a press made by the Go-Figure Corporation, printed with
Mystery Inks on Inscrutable Paper, one realizes that the best one can do is
educated guesswork.

It's my sense, from many years working in this country, that when one says
"CMYK" here, more often than not the implication is "SWOP", meaning the set
of expectations that the acronym represents (a standard? a specification? a
piece of advice? it's still not completely clear, but clear enough for a
start). "SWOP" seems to be the expectation, whether the job actually ends on
a web press or on sheetfed, and once the image is in that ballpark, people
downstream seem to know what to do with it, most of the time.

Once that is understood, the guesswork gets narrowed to just a few
decisions, mostly involving black generation, TAC, dot gain, one-color
blacks, pure inks and a few other factors. And most of these can be
considered properly addressed indirectly through a carefully color-managed
workflow, possibly including device link profiles, and certainly a round of
proofs from either a RIP-based inkjet or some other non-film-based system,
knowing that we are providing an achievable visual target.

Once we view the task that way, it suddenly loses a lot of the "sorcery"
aspect, and becomes another one of the informed decisions to be made in the
course of a day. That's where the "mystique" sort of falls away, in my view.

Marco Ugolini


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Who does the seperations?
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
    • Re: Who does the seperations?
      • From: "john castronovo" <email@hidden>
    • Re: Who does the seperations?
      • From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Who does the seperations? (From: email@hidden (Lee Blevins))

  • Prev by Date: Re: suggest good Mac system for the clueless
  • Next by Date: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • Next by thread: Re: Who does the seperations?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread