Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
- Subject: Re: This is not good-Layoffs at X-Rite
- From: Peter Hammarling <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:12:19 +0200
'scuse that a penny-pinching and irresponsible designer should barge
in to the rarified heights of CM debate, but this
It goes far beyond that. Designers DON'T want to be liable for
their own work.
It's simple economics.
is a ludicrous position.
Designers are famous for being fussy pains-in-the-neck (ask any
printer) and if they can't face entering the CM labyrinth it's
because of the daunting levels of geekage and incomprehensible
complication involved.
And anyway, beyond having a good calibrated screen to make reliable
design decisions, I don't think it's practical for designer's to
produce contract type proofs in-house, if that's what this debate is
about. Isn't it the job of the pre-press house and the printer to
produce accurate colour?
Maybe the ColorMunki will make in-house proofing more accessible,
which will shift technical responsibilities around yet again, and
might be a good thing, though from what Andrew Rodney says about the
software, maybe not.
Peter Hammarling
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden