• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Images for print
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Images for print


  • Subject: Re: Images for print
  • From: Bob Marchant <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:57:10 +0100


On 10 Oct 2008, at 23:18, eric@poem wrote:

Well, they were/are charged with the responsibility of accurately realising the signed off original in the target condition gamut, difficult if significantly important areas of that picture are out of that gamut...

Hi Eric.

You said earlier that workflow had changed ..We now do that on a daily basis at the studio when were fortunate enough to be supplied a specific target condition gamut . If not , we'll aim at an existing standard that best suits the intended press destination in addition to supplying RGB. And a "read me". And a CMYK proof.

Well I was including photographers in the conceptual camp...

We all paint with light <g>.

but I see what you mean, but the fact is that, again they were/are bound by the constraints of the CMYK gamut - and their product connected directly with the printing process, who practioners are definitely are the Cinderellas when it comes to understanding the science behind colour reproduction...

Even some of the ugly sisters now have a grasp of the science. Now we can all go to the ball.


And as for DP10, well digital cromalin was built on the serendipity that Du Pont stumbled across with analogue cromalin, it was a great deal better than flat bed wet proofs, but coloured powder on a post-it note, come on.(no disrespect to 3M). For years we used as a bible a flawed gamut.

And we often had to separate to profiles built on that standard even though the principle was flawed.The move to ISO standards has been far too slow , but we are at last getting there

Well, it is still constrained by the same CMYK gamut

Unless you are a photographer working in more than one medium....

, so I guess that makes me a photographer too...

Still got the yellow socks :-) ?

Regards,

Bob.




_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Images for print (From: "eric@poem" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Images for print (From: Bob Marchant <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Images for print (From: "eric@poem" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Images for print (From: Bob Marchant <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Images for print (From: "eric@poem" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Images for print
  • Next by Date: RE: Images for print
  • Previous by thread: Re: Images for print
  • Next by thread: Re: Images for print
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread