Re: ColorsyncScripting
Re: ColorsyncScripting
- Subject: Re: ColorsyncScripting
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:24:04 -0700
At 6:33 PM +0200 9/1/09, edmund ronald wrote:
>Aren't we being pissy today, Steve? You actually expect Apple to
>grandfather in older API's and keep things working?
yeah, but as I redirected it away from Mr Gnaegy I felt I could turn up the heat a bit ;-)
>I wonder whether it isn't possible to create some Applescript
>"Application" bundles which would encapsulate the old stuff and keep
>it around and working - some people may otherwise feel that they
>cannot transition to Snow Leopard for production purposes.
it might be. There's a certain heralded computer company in California that could do just the thing... they have a great distribution mechanism as well....
>As we all know, batch scripts, Apple Scripts etc often contain encode
>mission critical production workflows, which is why they were written
>in the first place - anything else is not worth the time to automate.
indeed. That's why I'm surprised it just disappeared I'm hoping we can get some sort of explanation?
Steve
________________________________________________________________________
o Steve Upton CHROMiX www.chromix.com
o (hueman) 866.CHROMiX
o email@hidden 206.985.6837
________________________________________________________________________
--
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden