Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner

Subject: Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner
From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:13:13 +0200

Graeme Gill schreef:

Ernst Dinkla wrote:
As I understand it DNG files made of Sigma Fovean Raw files are linear DNG files and are probably more like what Vuescan delivers. Maybe we can not call Sigma's X3F output Raw either.
"Raw" means "what comes out of the hardware". Whether
the hardware has a mosaic is irrelevant.
[In fact of course, it's often not really raw hardware values.
 Often things like sensor sensitivity adjustment and dead
 pixel fixing has been applied.]
Graeme Gill.


That is my point of view too.

--
Met vriendelijke groeten,      Ernst


Dinkla Gallery Canvas Wrap Actions

|          Dinkla Grafische Techniek         |
|             www.pigment-print.com           |
|             (         unvollendet         )            |
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Vuescan and Nikon scanner (From: Jeffrey Stevensen <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner (From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Metamerism vs Color Inconstancy, again

Next by Date:
iQSmart profile not reading in Aperture

Previous by thread:
Re: Vuescan and Nikon scanner

Next by thread:
iQSmart profile not reading in Aperture

Index(es):

Date
Thread