Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Wire ~ via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:53:35 -0800
Why is it fair for you to make this generalized statement in your
tutorials, especially considering your taking on the mantle of
responsibility as an educator, but for me to make this same point is
ignorant?
You've antagonized me over making the same observation. after I clarified
in subsequent posts, and brought up that I understand the contextuality of
the matter to show you I am not struggling with these concepts.
I'm asking this rhetorically to call you out. Not because I expect you to
answer the specific question.
The fact is you should enjoy no such privilege of the statement in your
video by your own reasoning.
I would not bother to call this out except you've made it such a personal
point of berating my posts—and me personally!
And when confronted with the obvious double-standard you appeal to your own
authority.
I will invoke Godwin's Law and destroy myself for you. Seig heil !
P.S.
It's really impossible to take you seriously.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:40 PM Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <
email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2020, at 4:10 PM, Wire ~ via colorsync-users <
> email@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew, so I am watching your sRGB tutorial on the web, and in this
> video you remark, and I quote
> >
> > "If your camera is set up to give you sRGB, then that's what you're
> gonna get"
>
> Yes.
>
> > So what's the finer point here?
>
> Seems you should concentrate on understanding the broader point before
> confusing yourself by asking about the finer point.
>
> Jack Holm and I co-authored this paper for the ICC, I think you should
> download it and read it, slowly, perhaps several times:
>
>
> http://www.color.org/ICC_white_paper_20_Digital_photography_color_management_basics.pdf
>
> Here’s just a sentence of the article I think you should read, slowly,
> perhaps several times:
> “When you set your digital camera controls to capture an image (which is
> initially a RAW data file) into a color space (let's use sRGB in this
> example), there are two fundamental parts to this process: rendering the
> data and then encoding the data. In creating an output-referred image, the
> camera or computer system has to perform the color rendering processing
> before it can encode the result of the processing into sRGB“.
>
> It seems your understanding of the two fundamental parts of the process,
> rendering raw data into an encoding color space is limited and you’re
> confused by this fact.
>
> > If we placed your tutorial next to your diatribes on this thread, which
> definition should we choose?
>
> We? Here’s my suggestion specifically for you:
> 1. Instead of jumping around on differing subjects you don’t appear to
> understand, stick to one and learn the broader points.
> 2. Consider buying a book on color management and reading it, slowly and
> several times. I believe this is a good one for you to start with:
>
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Color-Management-Digital-Photographers-Dummies/dp/0470048921
> <
> https://www.amazon.com/Color-Management-Digital-Photographers-Dummies/dp/0470048921
> >
>
> If “we“ placed your misunderstood diatribes on this thread revolving
> around fundamentals of color management, I think this book will be a good
> start for you.
>
> Andrew Rodney
> http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden