Re: Changing the way the OS responds to a USB DAC
Re: Changing the way the OS responds to a USB DAC
- Subject: Re: Changing the way the OS responds to a USB DAC
- From: Paul Davis <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:40:33 -0500
On 3/4/12, Brian Willoughby <email@hidden> wrote:
> I intended to tack this on to my previous response, but...
>
> On Mar 4, 2012, at 13:10, Paul Davis wrote:
>> if your "DAC" (its not really a DAC at all, but i understand your
>> use of the terminology)
>
>
> I believe that "SB Tech" is correct in his use of the term "DAC."
> The only requirement for that terminology is that there be digital
> input and analog output, with conversion that correlates the two.
> USB is most certainly a digital data stream, so a USB-DAC is a valid
> subcategory of DAC.
i don't know the device he is using. my point was merely a gamble on
the notion that he probably/possibly has a box that is *more* than
just a DAC. it is a gamble, and i could be wrong.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden