Re: PackageMaker license language confusion
Re: PackageMaker license language confusion
- Subject: Re: PackageMaker license language confusion
- From: Aaron Griffin <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:56:12 -0500
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Iceberg-Dev <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2009, at 11:26 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Iceberg-Dev <email@hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:18 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> You can check 2 things:
>>>
>>> - there is no licenses at the root of the Resources folder. They are all
>>> in
>>> .lproj folders.
>>>
>>> - the name of the .lprog folders are not abbreviated (English.lproj is
>>> better than en.lproj).
>>
>> Both of these are correct. (no top level files AND full-name lproj dirs).
>>
>> I tried both of these alternate options to see if it fixed anything,
>> and nothing changed (except that the top-level resources seemed to
>> override the languages and NEVER switch to those languages... if the
>> top level files were english, all languages displayed english)
>
> Can you create a small package example illustrating this weird behavior so
> that it can examine?
Scratch what I said - changing everything to short names works perfect.
I will still try to construct a small package that is broken for you to see.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden