[Solved] Re: InternetConfig incompatibility between 10.2 and 10.1?
[Solved] Re: InternetConfig incompatibility between 10.2 and 10.1?
- Subject: [Solved] Re: InternetConfig incompatibility between 10.2 and 10.1?
- From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:17:16 +0100
On lundi, dic 2, 2002, at 11:43 Europe/Paris, Quinn wrote:
At 11:16 +0100 2/12/02, Stiphane Sudre wrote:
Unfortunately it's a Cocoa application.
Maybe it's possible to get the IC**** pointers dynamically using some
UPP or Mach-o stuff.
My understanding is that just loading the Carbon framework into a
Cocoa application prior to 10.2 was bad. However, I'm not an expert
in this area. Try the Cocoa mailing lists; I'm sure that Cocoa folks
have had to deal with this before for other, non-IC functions.
I think I find both a solution and the origin of the problem.
My project is a Cocoa Application project.
In the Frameworks section, I had the following items:
Linked: Carbon, Cocoa
Other Frameworks:
SystemConfiguration
IOKit
Security
Foundation
AppKit
Application Services
When I removed the "Application Services" framework from my project, it
still compiles fine and runs on 10.2. And it runs on 10.1 too.
So it looks like that adding Application Services is not a good idea
when you want to maintain backward compatibility with 10.1.
_______________________________________________
macnetworkprog mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/macnetworkprog
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.