Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- Subject: Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- From: steve stout <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:12:50 -0700
So am I a bad person if I don't really care that my websites aren't
totally compliant with the specs? The pages work in every modern
browser that I've tried them in and to me that's all that matters. I
don't have the time to nit pick about things that 99.9% of the users
will never see when my boss just wants things done.
./steve
Concerning Dreamweaver and GoLive, they're just amatory tools, you
can't produce a real compliant website with these "tools", if you
don't believe me, just try to validate a page (real one, not a basic
thing) done with these "tools" (the Adobe website is done with GoLive
6, and not standard compliant at all)
BBedit is a great tool though.
But to make a real website, you must know the language (HTML/XHTML,
CSS), here's what I'm saying when someone doesn't understand why
Dreamweaver isn't a real tool:
"When you want to speak to let say a spanish, don't you think an
electronic assistant isn't enough?, so how can you believe talking
"Web" with Dreamweaver..."
There are other consideration behind having a non standard compliant
website (so the use of these "tools"), like licence fees, political
and ethical view, but it's not the point here.
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.