• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please


  • Subject: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please
  • From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:45:20 +0800

Hi Michael and list members,

I agree with what you say.

On 08/07/2004, at 12:51 AM, Michael Henderson wrote:
One important advocacy effort would be to develop some presentations for Java User Group meetings, particularly interactive
application development. EOModel -> D2W, EOModel -> D2JC, EOModel -> SOAP service

This is basically the seminar/demonstration I give to IT managers and developers (with some extra explanations and some basic WO stuff too - so they don't think it is all or nothing high-level development). It is exceptionally well received whenever I present (for 2 hours) and some people even want to buy WO there an then (they suggest I should be working for Apple sales ;-). Why isn't Apple doing this?


For anyone following the J2EE world there is a movement now to "lightweight" solutions (Struts, Spring, Hibernate) and O-R mapping has come into it's own.

I've also mentioned this a couple of times on the lists. It also shows that J2EE (the standard) is missing something between light-weight JSP/JDBC and heavy-weight JSP/EJB/CMP. As you say, people are moving to new solutions like Struts, Spring, Tapestry, Hibernate and Cayenne. NOW is really the time when Apple should be pushing WebObjects rather than giving up on selling it.


They were just too early for the market earlier on ... I remember they gave some training courses in Aus around 1996 ... unfortunately most of those attending didn't even know OO ... let alone understand OO frameworks and Object-Relational Mapping. A similar problem (being too early) exists with JavaClient (business-side objects) and the D2* technologies.

So the early bird seems to miss the worm if they go home before the sun rises ;-)

Cheers,
Ashley.

--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please
      • From: Nathan Dumar <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick) (From: Dov Rosenberg <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick) (From: Lotsa Cabo <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick) (From: LD <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (From: Lotsa Cabo <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (From: Dario Bagatto <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (From: Michael Henderson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WebObjects Builder ... again
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects Builder ... again
  • Previous by thread: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please
  • Next by thread: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread