Re: Time out!
Re: Time out!
- Subject: Re: Time out!
- From: Thomas <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:53:02 +1000
Perhaps we could have it both ways? If we had a tool that converted
between the two-file and one-file forms (possibly using XSLT), you
could at least keep the run-time generation and development-time
editing as separate issues.
After that you could add a second parser so that either form could be
used at run-time. Or even better, have the .html file itself define
which method was to be used-- either for the entire file or maybe
even for each tag.
Regards
Thomas
On 15/08/2006, at 2:57, Chuck Hill wrote:
Mixing wod definitions in with html is simply rude :-) It makes
refactoring even more of a pain than it already
is (with KVC) as now you have another set of files in which
references may be found.
I am not so fond of it myself. I have a number of pieces of code
that dynamically generate the WOD portion for use with canned HTML
(or vice versa). Changing these to having them all in one would be
a painful task. Luckily, the architecture of WOComponents is such
that we don't all need to use the same parser. Even different
pages in the same app can use different parsers.
If we are going to adapt an existing HTML editing tool for use with
WO we probably don't have any choice but to follow the herd,
discard the concept of WOD and merge both concepts into a single
HTML file.
Chuck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden