• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Foundation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Foundation


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • From: Yann Bizeul <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:04:11 +0200

My advice is that if we don't use WO to host the web site, we can use anything completely unrelated to WO, choosing a solution based on administration simplicity and accessibility, no matter it is a step backward technologicaly speaking.

Personnaly, I think we should run a basic solution using WO that will growth with the time to include modules people think are necessary, progressively.

As a starting point, a simple WO application with news engine and basic CMS features (projects repository with a link to the file, homepage, and descriptive text with categorization should be sufficient).

I agree the whole thing should be opensource

Yann Bizeul • yann at tynsoe.org
Cocoa Developer

Tynsoe Projects
BuddyPop • GeekTool • SSH Tunnel Manager • ...
http://projects.tynsoe.org/


Le 22 août 06 à 09:04, M. Blanc a écrit :


On 22 Aug 2006, at 06:31, email@hidden wrote:

I don't have a strong preference myself, but since Pascal has taken the initiative to design a community web site (which is very nice, btw) and is offering to help run the CMS, I think he should be able to choose which one we use. So I'll leave this up to him.

Sure, but be reminded that Magnolia is a huge step backwards: "JSP templating" and the like. Who is going to take charge of the design the day that Pascal is busy? Volunteers?


Somehow, going with Magnolia reminds the time when Microsoft was using unix for hosting HotMail. Only, it's much worse this time: at the end any unix is better than any windows. But in our case it would be the opposite. Pier running on top of Seaside is at least a step forward in some respects.

Ok, here is an example of what is possible with Pier/Seaside: http://scriptaculous.seasidehosting.st/

(hint: play with the counter at the bottom and with your browser back button trying to confound the WebApp. Impossible: this counter thing is a real App, no matter it is being served via Web).

Cheers
--mbj
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: "M. Blanc" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: Arturo Pérez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: "M. Blanc" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: "M. Blanc" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: XCode 2.3 --> XCode 2.4 [and WebObjects 5.3.2]
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread