• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06


  • Subject: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:59:08 -0700


On Aug 26, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Art Isbell wrote:

On Aug 26, 2006, at 6:09 AM, David Sanchez wrote:

I hope, XCode will be used to develop WO in the future. I do not know how because Cocoa-bridge is deprecated.

Xcode doesn't currently use the Java-ObjC bridge to build WO projects; it just invokes jam to build WO projects using javac or jikes.


On Aug 24, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Daryl Lee wrote:

Apple's strategy is to make WebObjects the best server-side runtime environment we can by:

- Making WO work well with ANT and the most popular IDEs, including Xcode and Eclipse

So instead of invoking jam, Xcode 3 will apparently invoke ant to build WO projects. This then offers the promise of the same ant WO projects being able to be managed by Xcode, Eclipse, and other Java IDE's that use ant.

I will slightly disagree with this. I think a more correct statement is, "This then offers the possibility of Xcode building the WO projects managed by Eclipse, and other Java IDE's that use ant." It is the WOProject Ant tasks, rather than Ant itself, that manages the build. And those tasks rely on certain resources that Xcode does not produce or maintain (i.e. the .classpath, the includes/excludes in the .wolips directory. Xcode has a much different view of managing the resources in a project. So adding a file or a component or a framework in Xcode is not going to update the files that WOProject relies on. If Xcode plugins are a possibility, this could be done.


I have a couple of projects that build in Eclipse, from Ant at the command-line, and from Xcode. Managing what is in these projects is a stumbling block. Often, then can be added in Xcode and Eclipse will see them on the file system and "do the right thing". However, a certain amount of work needs to be repeated in each IDE. I don't see that changing.


So it doesn't appear that the Java-ObjC bridge deprecation will prevent Xcode from managing future WO projects.

Agreed, the bridge is not going to be the problem.

Chuck

--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects





_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: James Stead <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: Paul Lynch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: Paul Lynch <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: Art Isbell <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Session Strangeness on 2nd Login
  • Next by Date: Re: Subclass final class (Boolean) ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Next by thread: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread