Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
- Subject: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
- From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 23:09:50 -0400
David Cederholm - 'Web Standards Solutions" - practical and useful
http://www.simplebits.com/publications/solutions/
and adopt a CSS "library" layer such as YUI or Google BluePrint. I
have only been using YUI and it makes CSS a pleasure ...... without
it you tear your hair out trying to get all major browsers rendering
the same.
Start with all YUI CSS components ..
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/
And if working in semantic HTMl and CSS, then IMHO, Eclipse component
editor is better than WOBuilder ....... it is just a matter of
getting used to it ...... you will be a better HTML/CSS coder because
of it ........ WOBuilder was fine for cruddy rough-work but it is too
much of a crutch. .... generates ugly code like most (all?) other GUI
HTML editor.... thank goodness for Mike Schrag's refactoring features
for cleaning up those old junky WOBuilder files.
On Sep 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Timmy wrote:
Anyone have reference material (or practical) advice for css.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden