Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
- Subject: Re: Use of finalize methods in WO
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:30:34 -0700
On Aug 21, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:
I don't think the non-existence is the point here, just the scary
proportion. I'd say in a healthy (i.e. not so Ferenghi like) world
the proportion would follow the Gaussian curve, so let's say 25% in
the really good range, 25% in the really bad, 50% somewhere in the
middle.
Care to speculate on the actual proportions?
Studies have shown it is 98% evil to 2 good. :-)
F
On Aug 21, 2008, at 14:16, Chuck Hill wrote:
If the consulting company views their best interest as keeping the
customer happy and getting additional projects going forward, then
it is far more likely that the tech that they choose will be the
best for the customer as well. This is exceedingly rare.
We exist. I do, I really do.
Sorry to sound so bleak, but I'd say that a majority of WO
projects out there are in-house projects where a working
application with a minimal amount of development time is really in
_everyone's_ best interests.
That is probably true, but there are consulting companies out there
(I can think of several) that make a significant portion of their
money on WO work.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden