• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)


  • Subject: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
  • From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:18:10 +0000

Hi!

WHAT!? Plasma TVs? Satellites? Noooooo.... anything with chips and transistors is strictly not allowed in the WebObjects refugee camp! Only the good old nature and perhaps some light bulbs and switches so we can read a good book at night...

  Yours

Miguel Arroz




On 2008/12/04, at 14:56, Don Lindsay wrote:

Are we back to herding goats again? I vote we have a huge main house with lots of Plasma TVs and satellite programming. Just in cases the goats get bored and want to watch the tube.

Don
On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:


Le 08-12-04 à 08:48, Q a écrit :

On 04/12/2008, at 10:33 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

Hi!

That's not the case. You can develop on whatever platform you want (no support from Apple for anything but OS X, as usual). You must have an OS X license for each development machine, BUT you don't need to use a Mac (you can keep your OS X boxes closed in a storage room or so!). The idea is, WebObjects frameworks are part of OS X, so you must pay OS X to develop WO. If you can do it on Linux or Windows, it's up to you, but you still must pay Apple the frameworks and the (ahem...) tools that are part of OS X.

Here we go again.

The license distributed with XCode 3.1 contradicts this assertion and explicitly states:

"For avoidance of doubt, you may not distribute the WebObjects Software on a stand-alone basis, and you may not develop application programs using the WebObjects Software (or any portion thereof) on any non-Apple branded computer."

This is also what we were told at WWDC. _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
      • From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141) (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: About instance's integrity. (was Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 1141) (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO Licence interpretation (again) (From: Don Lindsay <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Error generating SQL
  • Next by Date: Re: Error generating SQL
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
  • Next by thread: Re: WO Licence interpretation (again)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread