Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: John Huss <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:16:19 -0500
I read Anjo's post as sarcasm, but I could be wrong. The last round of api changes weren't especially pleasing.
John
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Pascal Robert
<email@hidden> wrote:
Le 09-03-31 à 14:38, Mike Schrag a écrit :
I mostly agree (without really understanding idempotent, homonym, mutator or clarity).
Actually, I'd vote for a WO release that added "get" to all methods and provided no compatibility deprecation at all.
Cheers, Anjo
Officially the last thing I expected to hear.
Me too, I was expecting something like "brain-dead API changes" :-)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden