Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:16:54 +0200
Am 31.03.2009 um 20:47 schrieb Pascal Robert:
Actually, I'd vote for a WO release that added "get" to all
methods and provided no compatibility deprecation at all.
Officially the last thing I expected to hear.
Me too, I was expecting something like "brain-dead API changes" :-)
For the record, of course this would be brain-dead, but at least it
would make a minimum of sense for a change...
This half-hearted tip-toeing is wreaking havoc anyway, it's becoming
basically impossible to maintain a common code base for the kind of
changes that were done so far.
Frankly, I'd rather have a "do it right already!" release than this
stupid mess of tiny and worthless changes we've seen so far. At least
one would assume that we might have something worthy in the end.
For the record: I actually planned to go to 5.4 so we can use the new
axis integration and *no one* of those I asked (and trust) is actually
using 5.4 in production!
So I think I could care less if WO 6 changes accessor names all over
the place, is re-based on Spring or is rewritten in ruby...
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden