Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: John Huss <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:22:42 -0500
I don't really care strongly either way about "get" or "no-get", but the downside is it makes it harder to integrate with libraries that expect the "beans" convention, like commons-collections for example.
John
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden