• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects become opensource ?


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
  • From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:42:28 +0200

Sorry, can't resist :) From what I understand is that your supreme court basically said that everything man-made under the sun should be patentable. Recently even they finally came to their sense and said it had to have some physical component.

The reason (as I understand it) is that patents are *not* for the benefit of the holders. They are to get holders to disclose on their stuff and to get a limited monopoly in return. This is to *promote* innovation so that others can simply look at the patent and build from that.

I find it pretty hard to imagine a concept in IT that is hard enough for someone well-versed in the field (not IT, the special application) that you can't come up with too once you see it can be done. The reason being it's pretty cheap. Look at MP3 for example, or JPEG. Once you got the idea that you *can* compress images or sounds with some math crap, it's only grunt-work to do it. LAME took about a year from a crappy patch-set to the final product.

Cheers, Anjo



Am 15.09.2009 um 22:19 schrieb Mike Schrag:

That example is tricky. Data structures can be considered mathematical concepts
sorry .. lazy example .. i kind of intended that in the "objecty" sense --- "data structure + algorithm". as i understand it, you would not (at least in the US) be able to patent a data structure (and technically not JUST an algorithm either). i believe you patent the use of a particular data structure + algorithm to solve a SPECIFIC problem.

ms

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
References: 
 >WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Stephane Guyot <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Tim Worman <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Nowak <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Nowak <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: David LeBer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Nowak <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: AndrĂ© Mitra <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Q <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects become opensource ? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects become opensource ?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread