Re: [OT] Play! Framework
Re: [OT] Play! Framework
- Subject: Re: [OT] Play! Framework
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:15:46 +1100
On 11/03/2011, at 8:21 PM, Orphee Sandjo wrote:
>> On 11/03/2011, at 2:37 PM, Joe Little wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I grok groovy more than scala, but that isn't saying much. I
>>> just see Grails as getting everything right about Java (for the most
>>> part)
>>
>> nothing wrong with groovy or Grails. For a statically typed, OO & functional lang I'm liking scala. But whatever gets the job done and keeps things interesting... :)
>>
>>> and picking what was right about Rails. Liftweb seems to make my
>>> brain hurt,
>>
>> admittedly the docs for lift have (for an intro) too much info... it needs some more quickstart guides. But it is a very cool and powerful framework. The templates are very nicely done: there's no logic in the display code, etc. Very active community.
>
> I don't know which is worse : logic in display code or display code in logic
:) Yep, I was initially horrified by that... but even though it allows display code in your code (as scala understands xml natively) you can just point it to a snippet template.
with regards,
-
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden