Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
- Subject: Re: Complimentary App Server Choice
- From: Matthew Ness via Webobjects-dev <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:19:19 +1100
I'll add we still actively develop quite a few WO apps, but to answer your
question with Bootique/Cayenne we are using various front end frameworks.
React, Angular, React Native and Flutter now for mobile.
Cheers,
Matt
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Jérémy DE ROYER wrote:
> Hi
>
> And about wo components framework ?
>
> What are you using with Bootique ?
>
>
> Jérémy
>
>> Le 13 févr. 2020 à 23:08, Matthew Ness via Webobjects-dev
>> <email@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>>
>> I wouldn't hesitate to recommend Bootique.
>>
>> We've had various types of Bootique apps in production for years now to
>> great success, some with the Cayenne module directly derived from older WO
>> apps/dbs, some communicating with existing WO apps, others simply processing
>> tasks.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Matt
>> http://logicsquad.net
>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, at 11:25 PM, Andrus Adamchik via Webobjects-dev wrote:
>>> My opinionated take is the following:
>>>
>>> * The "official" JavaEE is dead and is now a pure volunteer effort under
>>> https://jakarta.ee/ . The "appserver" concept has almost disappeared and
>>> morphed to something different. All the past market leaders have moved on
>>> to more lightweight solutions, though some still cling to .war deployment.
>>>
>>> * SpringBoot is the market leader in the Java world. If you are looking to
>>> build a marketable Java developer resume, learn SpringBoot.
>>>
>>> * If you need to write apps for your org or your customers, and are not
>>> constrained by the PHBs opinion, use Bootique. It is a better platform in
>>> the modern appserver-free world. Bootique is "commercially-viable" in a
>>> sense that there are hundreds of apps that run in prod for a number of
>>> years. But it is still an open source effort supported by community and a
>>> mid-sized company (ObjectStyle), so it is sometimes an uphill battle in
>>> organizations that are looking to conform to the lowest common denominator.
>>>
>>> So you decide :)
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 13, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev
>>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for that… it looks really interesting…
>>>>
>>>> Is it a commercially viable alternative to some of the others like JBoss,
>>>> Tomcat, Websphere etc..
>>>>
>>>> I would like to add another feather to my bow but not really sure which
>>>> architecture to devote time to so that I can work on bigger projects in a
>>>> team...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 11:16, Andrus Adamchik <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We are using Bootique: https://bootique.io/
>>>>>
>>>>> Just like SpringBoot, its idea is that it is not an "appserver". It gives
>>>>> you a plain Java app with your own "main" method, and a way to assemble
>>>>> various components together (and also modularity, dependency injection,
>>>>> consistent configuration and a large collection of ready-to-use modules).
>>>>> The app can serve web requests, run jobs or do whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unlike SpringBoot, Bootique is much smaller, starts much faster, and
>>>>> doesn't feel like magic. Also all the apps you write are automatically
>>>>> equipped with POSIX CLI.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2020, at 4:29 PM, Paul Yu via Webobjects-dev
>>>>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spring and it’s ecosystem seems to be pretty powerful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> Please excuse iOS autocomplete
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2020, at 8:06 AM, Gino Pacitti via Webobjects-dev
>>>>>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hey if any one was to use a different app server configuration other
>>>>>>> than WO what would you choose and why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What are most companies requesting these days in a Java system?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
--
Matt
http://logicsquad.net
https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden