• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XCode on Intel/Mac


  • Subject: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • From: Markus Hitter <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:15:28 +0100


Am 21.01.2006 um 00:59 schrieb email@hidden:

The fundamental bottom line, through these comparisons, is that the PPC relies on a good compiler, while Intel relies on good hardware engineers. And all we've got is gcc. And Intel does have some very good engineers.

You probably can expect gcc it's self to produce better code for i386 than for ppc. Remember, all those Linux folks out there are 80% or even 90% i386 folks. Better gcc means better Mac OS X :-)



Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/




_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Ken Baer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Matt Gough <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: Chris Espinosa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: David Reed <email@hidden>)
 >Re: XCode on Intel/Mac (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Xcode 1.5->2.2 import build setting ques
  • Next by Date: C++ runtime entry point before static intialization of obejcts...
  • Previous by thread: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • Next by thread: Re: XCode on Intel/Mac
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread