Re: why aren't xibs the default?
Re: why aren't xibs the default?
- Subject: Re: why aren't xibs the default?
- From: Timothy Reaves <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:10:57 -0500
On Dec 9, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Jonathan Hess wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Jon Hess wrote:
They aren't the default because many people depend on building on
a Tiger based machine.
That doesn't seem to make sense. Aren't .xibs an Xcode 3 feature,
and doesn't Xcode 3 require Leopard? If so, the stationery in Xcode
3 could easily use .xib.
Hey Rick -
It's true. The template projects in Xcode 3.0 could have easily used
XIB's. However, right now creating a new project with Xcode 3.0 that
is buildable with Xcode 2.4+ only requires changing the 'Project
Format' pop up button in the project inspector. If the template
files were all XIB's, developers would also have to open re-save,
remove and add a bunch of XIB and NIB files to their project to make
the project build with Xcode 2.4+. XIB files are definitely the way
forward, but it's always nice to give users a bit of breathing room
when introducing a file format that isn't backwards compatible
(design time only) with the previous version of your tool.
Ya gotta love when a new format is introduced, is the recommended one
to use, but the tools discourage you from doing so. Brilliant!
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden