• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Xcode debugger quality
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Xcode debugger quality


  • Subject: Re: Xcode debugger quality
  • From: Lyndsey Ferguson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 09:25:06 -0400
  • Thread-topic: Xcode debugger quality

On 5/1/08 9:05 AM, "Paul Walmsley" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Not everyone does everything in Cocoa.  The debugger's support for C++
> is roughly below what Visual Studio had in 2003.

I have to disagree with this, Visual Studio 2003 has a much better debugger.
It is faster, I have never had it timeout and viewing the data is much
easier. Did I mention that it is faster?

I will agree with the other posts about Shark. It is a very nice tool, much
better than what we use on Windows (GlowCode -- although its profile report
helps point out hotspots of trouble faster)

Lyndsey

--
Mr. Lyndsey D. Ferguson
Software Engineer
Nemetschek N.A., Inc.
http://www.nemetschek.net


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Xcode-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Xcode debugger quality (From: Paul Walmsley <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Xcode debugger quality
  • Next by Date: Re: Xcode debugger quality
  • Previous by thread: Re: Xcode debugger quality
  • Next by thread: Re: problems with Perforce and Xcode 3.0
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread