• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OT] Vote!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Vote!


  • Subject: Re: [OT] Vote!
  • From: Jordi Bares <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:12:18 +0100
  • Organization: The Mill

We could offer some punishment too, physical i mean... that would be out
of topic.

We could send the looser to Guantanamo and follow his first weeks.. sure
fun for the family.

jb


On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 12:02, Steve Foster wrote:
> You mean "fire the candidates" - like the UK TV show Big Brother where
> they turf out the dead wood!!!
>
> With the TV show an ass**le always wins so Bush should win on merit
> this time!!
>
> Am I running of topic? - Soz
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On 19 Aug 2005, at 10:33, Jordi Bares wrote:
>
> >>> This is a good illustration on the reason computers could be better.
> >>> I do not believe an election could be won by 2 votes, or 53 votes for
> >>> that matter. There should be some statistical significance taken into
> >>> account.
> >>
> >> What's this got to do with computers? A nation's election law decides
> >> whether
> >> an election can be won with 1 single vote difference, or requires a
> >> larger
> >> margin, or a minimum of 50% of cast votes, or a minimum of 2/3s of
> >> cast
> >> votes. In some countries there will be second or even third rounds
> >> when the
> >> margin is considered too small. In others, a single vote can make the
> >> difference. In yet other systems, a minority can win as if it has a
> >> majority.
> >> This is about election laws, not about which tool you use to
> >> implement them.
> >
> > I would like the ability to fire the candidates, let's say 2% decide
> > not
> > to vote but fire Mr XXXX (put your favourite name there) then the
> > candidate is eliminated...
> >
> > And what about using a truth detector on their TV appearances to show
> > the amount of bullsh1te they generate as they speak.
> >
> > Also, the candidates should show an area of true expertise so we know
> > they can do something more than just talk rubish. No lawyers nor any
> > other parasites.
> >
> > Plus now we are here... why citizens of other countries don't have a
> > say? in a world like the one we live the mistakes of the president of
> > the USA are propagated thru everybody everywhere, we should have a
> > say!!! i want to vote!!!
> >
> > jb
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> > Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> > email@hidden
> >
> > This email sent to email@hidden
> >
> >
> Steve Foster
> Head of Online Development
> email@hidden
> 01709 364721
> 01709 515285
> http://www.globe-media.com
>


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Applescript-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Vote! (From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Vote! (From: deivy petrescu <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Vote! (From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>)
 >Re:[OT] Vote! (From: deivy petrescu <email@hidden>)
 >Re:[OT] Vote! (From: Sander Tekelenburg <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Re:[OT] Vote! (From: Jordi Bares <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [OT] Vote! (From: Steve Foster <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Vote!
  • Next by Date: Re: Finder f*ck-ups
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Vote!
  • Next by thread: "text art item" no longer works in AI 10
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread