• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?


  • Subject: Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
  • From: "M. Uli Kusterer" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:29:21 +0200

At 12:10 Uhr +0200 16.04.2004, Christian Brunschen wrote:
I think a little bit of stick and a little bit of carrot in combination
may be even better. Make the demo not *crippled*, but remove somethign
from it or impose some limitation; nothing that hinders exploring the
product fully. And then make registering unlock the product fully, as well
as offering something above the product itself (support is an obvious
one!)

I guess it depends on the application. Cripple something that is important for serious use, but don't remove things people need to try it out. For example, the typical document-based application can easily be crippled by simply allowing everything except saving files.

That's a simple override of an NSDocument method, and the users can try all the features of your app. Of course, if the application's entire business is converting between file formats, this won't make sense. In that case I'd rather suggest you limit the number of files that can be converted.

BTW -- anybody have a good idea where to put the "counter" or "expiry date" files for such a scheme on OS X? In OS 9 we used to just create invisible files at the root level of the hard disk (can't use "Preferences" or "Application Support/MyApp", that'd be too obvious).

Though, if you have lots of preferences, putting that date in the prefs file may actually be an advantage, because then the user will lose their prefs each time they kill the prefs file to get rid of the time stamp.
--
Cheers,
M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..."
http://www.zathras.de
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
      • From: Christoffer Lerno <email@hidden>
    • Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
      • From: Stéphane Sudre <email@hidden>
References: 
 >[little OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C (From: Matt Jaffa <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [little OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C (From: Stefan Pantke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [little OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C (From: Allan Odgaard <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [little OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C (From: Stefan Pantke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C (From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product? (From: Stefan Pantke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product? (From: "M. Uli Kusterer" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product? (From: Christoffer Lerno <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product? (From: Allan Odgaard <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product? (From: Christoffer Lerno <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product? (From: Christian Brunschen <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
  • Next by Date: Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
  • Previous by thread: Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
  • Next by thread: Re: [now OT] Licensing/Implementing in Cocoa/Obj-C - Interest in product?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread