Re: Profile Quality? Why?
Re: Profile Quality? Why?
- Subject: Re: Profile Quality? Why?
- From: Dave Camp <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:09:49 -0800
So, the different quality levels are implemented by having multiple tables
in a profile? I was under the impression that quality was essentially the
inverse of speed here and less precise but faster algorithms were used to do
the color conversions.
Which way is it?
Dave
on 11/28/00 6:02 AM, email@hidden at email@hidden wrote:
>
> Why would anyone want anything but "Best" quality?
>
>
Lets see: to build compact web-taggable profiles, to build LUT based profiles
>
that were closer to matrix based profile sizes, to build profile libraries
>
for web download, to profile very liniar devices where localized variations
>
between the points were not likely, to profile very spikey devices and miss
>
the spikes, to profile coarse gamut devices where it doesn't really matter,
>
to profile highly variable devices frequently and quickly (does color laser
>
come to mind?)... um, there are a few more complex reasons as well, and
>
reasons for dumbing down just certain tables or directions, but that's a
>
start.