Re: Apple vs Apple
Re: Apple vs Apple
- Subject: Re: Apple vs Apple
- From: Joel <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:24:13 -0500
Henrik Holmegaard wrote:
(clip)
The concept is that the OS level
ICC API has a default CMM built in, and may load third party CMMs as
extensions, if application software does not prefer to use its own
CMM. Thus the Apple ICC API (which is what ColorSync is) has the
Apple CMM built in, and the Windows ICC API (which is what Image
Color Management is) has the Heidelberg CMM built in.
Bueno. Here I am building profiles on the PC using ColorCal which
uses the LinoCMM but I use these profiles on the MAC, which does not
have the LinoCMM installed. To maintain the integrity of the creator
CMM would I be better off leaving the profile default CMM alone,
changing it to AppleCMM for the MAC platform, or change it to the
HeidiCMM which exists on both platforms and is the nearest neighbour
to the LinoCMM?
Hope some of the history lesson helps ... -:).
Sure does. And you are remarkably fluent in your ICCese too.
...Gurgle, mumble, mumble, buurrp.
--
joel johnstone - designtype
Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
(Character driven by my graphic user interface)