Re: RGB Color Space Info Request
Re: RGB Color Space Info Request
- Subject: Re: RGB Color Space Info Request
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 20:02:02 -0500
>
snip ...
>
By that, I mean that the areas of high gamut colour [inside scanner
>
<space> but outside the WS] - which previously contained tonal
>
differentiation are now clipped to the same value, I've see it in
>
backlit leaves. If the WS is too small [as ARGB often is from a wide
>
gamut scanner (if I may call it that)] this tonal info is now gone -
>
whatever the output device. If that tonal separation had been
>
preserved, it could have been used in printing - with careful
>
targetting and the infinitely more sensitive conversion we get when
>
going WS > Output space.
>
>
I agree it's rare to see the difference in prints - but why not hald
>
all the data unclipped 'til output since we can??
>
>
Regards
>
>
NeilB
Could not agree more but I don't think Andrew is against the idea of using
any of those "extra-color preserving" spaces. It's just that the arguments
goes on and on. And, to some extent, they can be seen as moot. Andrew will
agree to always what "looks best".
FWIW, I use both aRGB and Joe Holmes's EktaSpace.
My 2c.
Regards,
Roger Breton
Laval, Canada
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.