• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
eci ISO Coated vs. Adobe Europe ISO Coated (was: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

eci ISO Coated vs. Adobe Europe ISO Coated (was: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile?)


  • Subject: eci ISO Coated vs. Adobe Europe ISO Coated (was: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile?)
  • From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:23:33 +0100
  • Organization: schrift & form GmbH

Rolf Gierling wrote:
Hello Paul,

Paul Schilliger wrote:
What should I do in order to have the most predictable color?


1) Review your work again by assigning ISOcoated. If it look ok, leave them as they are,
if not, you'll have to convert them to ISOcoated.

1a) ensure that the black genreation an total ink limit is uniform and suitable for the printing process. If not, you'll have to convert the affected objects.



2) If your work is finished, change your settings to ISOcoated (NOT EuropeISOCoatedFOGRA27), -> www.eci.org
I can't believe why Adobe chose another name for a standard.



ISO 12647-2:2004 is the standard,

OFCOM_PO_P1_F60_04 ist one of the prining conditions it defines.

FOGRA27 (http://www.color.org/FOGRA27.html) is the
characterization data set for this process registered at the ICC Website
(http://www.color.org/drsection1.html)

Both "ISOcoated.icc" from http://eci.org and "EuropeISOCoatedFOGRA27.icc" from Adobe
are profiles based on the abovementioned data set.


How good the colorimetric intent of this (an some ohter) Profiles correspond to the data set can be seen here:
http://digitalproof.info/profcheck/profcheck5ir1b1.html


The "bubble diameter" in the chars is proportional to Delta E94 and scaled by faktor 5 against a/b.

The "Top 40" differences ;-) are listed in the table on the right an highlighted in the chart.

The values were generated unsing Graeme Gills "profcheck"-Tool (http://argyllcms.com/) -- Special thanks to Graeme :-))

How different their gamut mapping performs in a "comnon cirical situation" can bee seen at http://digitalproof.info/perceptual-rendering/gelb-vgl.tif
(it's a Lab TIF, so you have to download it)


Klaus

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: eci ISO Coated vs. Adobe Europe ISO Coated (was: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile?)
      • From: Rolf Gierling <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile? (From: Paul Schilliger <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile? (From: Rolf Gierling <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Colorport data into Profilemaker as spkt
  • Next by Date: color managing Kodak 1400
  • Previous by thread: Re: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile?
  • Next by thread: Re: eci ISO Coated vs. Adobe Europe ISO Coated (was: Dumb question for european prepress specialists: Which profile?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread