Re: AppleScripting ColorSync
Re: AppleScripting ColorSync
- Subject: Re: AppleScripting ColorSync
- From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:55:10 +0100
- Organization: schrift & form GmbH
Martin Orpen wrote:
are you sure with _relative_ an perceptual?
_saturation_ and perceptual should be identical with ISO Web Coated
(It's an elder Heidelberg profile where the saturation and perceptual
intent is identical)
I'm sure. Clemens' script didn't offer saturation as an option!
Here is an image that I've shot especially for this test:
nice shot, BTW. May I add it to my personal collection of test images?
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/_DSC0140.jpg>
Ideal for CMYK :-)
LOL!
Here are the results -- p, r, a = perceptual, relative, absolute
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/converted__DSC0140_p.jpg>
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/converted__DSC0140_r.jpg>
<http://www.web36531.clarahost.co.uk/filedump/converted__DSC0140_a.jpg>
Perceptual and relative are identical.
indeed, they are.
This reminds me of another bug that I reported back in 2005 and was
supposed to have been fixed in Leopard - looks like it was fixed for
CMYK jpegs created by Adobe Photoshop but not for CMYK jpegs created by
the OS :(
yes, there seems to be another bug -- or did you mean /inverted/ instead
of /converted/ ;-) ?
see <http://digitalproof.info/colorsync-users/screenshot.png>
Klaus
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden