Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: i1 Scanning Table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: i1 Scanning Table

Subject: Re: i1 Scanning Table
From: Matthew Ward <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:53:02 +0000


On 2 Mar 2010, at 12:30, Martin Weberg wrote:

f you find differences, it is between YOUR
devices in their current state. A general statement is not possible
without sampling a representative "population" of i1:s and iSis:s.

Don't you run the risk of checking how uneven the patches are rather than the repeatability (or accuracy) of the measuring instrument?

best
Matthew Ward
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: i1 Scanning Table
From: Martin Weberg <email@hidden>


References:  
  >i1 Scanning Table (From: "Mike Stewart" <email@hidden>)
  >Re: i1 Scanning Table (From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>)
  >Re: i1 Scanning Table (From: Martin Weberg <email@hidden>)
  >Re: i1 Scanning Table (From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>)
  >Re: i1 Scanning Table (From: Martin Weberg <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Monaco 4.8.4 for Snow Leopard

Next by Date:
max deltaE

Previous by thread:
Re: i1 Scanning Table

Next by thread:
Re: i1 Scanning Table

Index(es):

Date
Thread