Re: i1 Scanning Table
Re: i1 Scanning Table
- Subject: Re: i1 Scanning Table
- From: Martin Weberg <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:52:57 +0100
Hi Matthew
2010/3/2 Matthew Ward <email@hidden>:
>
> On 2 Mar 2010, at 12:30, Martin Weberg wrote:
>
>> f you find differences, it is between YOUR
>> devices in their current state. A general statement is not possible
>> without sampling a representative "population" of i1:s and iSis:s.
>
> Don't you run the risk of checking how uneven the patches are rather than
> the repeatability (or accuracy) of the measuring instrument?
You mean if the spectrophotometer pass the patches in a slightly
different path, between the two measurements? Yes, that could
introduce errors due to non-uniform patches. This could be eliminated
using perfectly uniform test patches.
Martin Weberg
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden