Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 15:41:38 -0600
On May 2, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ben Goren wrote:
> Except, of course, where you wrote that creating a colorimetrically-correct reproduction of a work of art is not possible
I said no such thing. I said that depending on the raw processing engine its not possible because, if you would again read the ICC article, these processors only produce output referred.
> What in that article is relevant to improving the colorimetric match of original art when creating reproductions of it?
It simply agrees with the point Neil made.
> Heck, for that matter, *DO* you now or have you ever done copy work?
Yup.
> the fact that you're handwaving at badly-written off-topic layman-level documents to support your assertion that nobody else knows what they're doing seems to be pretty strong evidence that you're the un-clueful one here.
I never made any such assertions. You are however.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden